What is better Android or iOS - comparison. Which is better Android or Windows Phone? Windows and Android operating system comparison
To understand whether to choose Android or Windows Phone, it is worth understanding the advantages and disadvantages of each system. To do this, you need to consider their individual parameters and decide.
To begin with, you should pay attention to In both systems, it is quite attractive. If we talk about whether Android or Windows Phone is better, then it is worth noting that the first system (latest versions) has all the advantages of previous modifications, plus a lot of new things have been added for the convenience of users. This system is universal for tablets and smartphones, and WP can be used exclusively on smartphones. Android notifies the user of various events using widgets on the home screen, and WP uses live tiles for this. Since in the first system it is much easier to scroll from left to right and back, many people prefer this option. However, WP remains the most stylish option in terms of interface, so it wins.
If you choose Android or Windows Phone, then it is worth considering hardware support. The Microsoft platform works only on those devices with whose manufacturers the company has partnerships: these are Samsung, Acer, Asus, Nokia. The Android source code is open, so this platform has become more widespread. This is the reason why this platform has the upper hand in this category.
When considering which system to prefer, Android or Windows Phone, it is worth mentioning such an important point as multitasking. This option is considered the main one for a modern smartphone. Both systems provide good opportunities for this, but the product from Google is more advanced in this sense. That's why Android wins here again.
An important parameter for the system at the moment is services. Considering why Windows Phone is better than Android, it is worth noting better interaction with all kinds of services. In contacts there are several tabs: “Latest”, “All”, “What’s new”. The first has 8 tiles showing the latest SMS and calls, as well as messages posted on the Facebook wall. In this category, the Microsoft product is significantly superior to its competitor.
Many users want to be able to download a variety of applications for different occasions, and here Android is significantly superior to its competitor, since its application store has more than 250 thousand different programs. However, this can also be attributed to the fact that this platform has existed for much longer.
It is trying to bring all its users under one roof with ICS, and Microsoft is working to create a new ecosystem in the mobile industry that will provide customers with choice beyond the existing systems. It is expected that many will choose Windows Phone over Android.
In conclusion, we can say that the choice between these two systems must be made in such a way that it is convenient for you first of all. Windows Phone can be called more stylish and elegant, while Android is distinguished by its ease of use and development. If you like a large selection of applications, then WP will be a little difficult for you to cope with.
This post is the user's own opinion and experience of using different mobile operating systems.
To begin with, I want to dot all the i's. This material is not a review or anything like that. This is the quintessence of the thoughts and impressions of a simple user who used smartphones on three popular platforms: Android, iOS and Windows Phone, and as a result chose one.
Well, having explained what I want to tell you, you can begin.
QUESTION ONE: WHY NOT iOS?
I will say right away that my user experience on this platform is limited to just one device - the iPhone 4. I purchased this device under the impression of the biography of Steve Jobs that I had read before. Jobs was a very strong and unique personality, so I became curious about what kind of beast this iPhone was. Plus, one of my colleagues had recently bought the same device and was very pleased with it and praised it. The first impression was (especially after the buggy and slow Samsung Galaxy Y, from which my acquaintance with the world of smartphones began, but more on that later) - WOW, HOW COOL! Nothing slowed me down, smooth operation of the system, nice appearance - all this created a very pleasant first impression. But, as it turned out, this apparent simplicity hides a bunch of pitfalls:
- Stone number three – dancing with a tambourine. When I bought this device, I had no idea how often I would have to perform tambourine dances and how often I would have to use the very “optimized” iTunes. After all, you can’t just download music to your phone, you can’t set your own ringtone, you can’t receive files or send them via Bluetooth (with the exception of photos). You can’t even just transfer music from your computer to your phone without iTunes (the file system is so closed). Overall, I didn't like it very much. Looking ahead, I’ll say that the T-shirts got rid of these “don’ts” and did the right thing.
- Stone number four - price. This is one of the main factors that protect me from returning to iOS. I believe that the prices for their devices are unreasonably high and I am not going to overpay several hundred euros for a brand. That’s basically all on this issue. Let's move on to the next point
Stone number one is the abundance of applications for this platform. I do not share these enthusiasms and statements that iOS has everything a person needs to fully use a smartphone. Maybe I was unlucky, but it just so happened that there were no applications that were necessary and suitable for me at that time (and one is still missing). For example, due to the specifics of my work, I constantly need an office, in particular Excel, but then it was not available on this platform, and its analogues were not even close. Of course, now the office is present on this axis, but for me the train has already left, and for a number of reasons stated below, I am not going to return.
Stone number two is uneasy simplicity. Jobs positioned the smartphone as a device that was extremely easy to use. But how do you like, for example, such a “simplification” as the inability to answer a call from a locked phone? Or the inability to pin a contact to the Start screen? Or programs that are constantly hanging in the memory because the exit button simply minimizes them? And in this system there are such small shortcomings as a carriage and a small cart. They generally spoiled my impression of the device and the platform as a whole.
QUESTION TWO: WHY NOT ANDROID?
Unlike the first point, the list of devices that I used on Android is not limited to one model, I’ll quickly list them:
Samsung Galaxy Y, Samsung Galaxy S3, Samsung Galaxy S4, Huawei Y530, LG L7, Samsung Galaxy XCover, Samsung Galaxy Tab 2, and a couple of GoClever tablets.
As you know, Android is very popular all over the world. It seems to me that the main reason for its popularity is very simple - EVERYTHING is possible in it. Indeed, EVERYTHING. From setting your own ringtone to changing the system beyond recognition (like CyanogenMod).
Well, after writing these lines, I thought hard, why is Android so bad for me? Why not him? The system has many advantages; almost all actions with it can be performed without much effort. And therefore, I will begin to answer the question posed by describing the advantages:
Firstly, the openness of the system played a role. You can do whatever you want with a smartphone/tablet, and from the very beginning, from the earliest versions, which cannot be said about Windows Phone. In practice, on our device we can do everything the same as on a computer. Transfer/copy files, install programs directly (which neither Windows Phone nor iOS allows). And much more (and if you make a root, then in general...).
Variety of software. The popularity of the system has resulted in the fact that the local store is full of a wide variety of..., excuse me, software for every taste and color.
Variety of model range. Almost all manufacturers produce devices on Android. So, when you come to the salon, your eyes sometimes run wide, but here smart and “knowledgeable” salespeople will always come to your aid, as well as salespeople who are well versed in technology, who are always ready to sell exactly what you need (in their opinion ).
Having dealt with the advantages, I will move on to the disadvantages:
The fact that you can do whatever your heart desires with the device can lead to unpleasant consequences, such as, for example, infection with a virus. You can, of course, install an antivirus, but it’s better to live without viruses at all, like the owners of Windows Phone and iOS live. And in general, the closedness of the system (not complete, but the same as in Windows Phone) is the best remedy for crooked hands and the headaches associated with it.
A huge number of programs does not mean the quality of these crafts. How much “slag” they have there! Plus Google’s disregard for its store. I often read in reviews: “Don’t download! Virus!”, “This is not the program it claims to be!” and a lot of things like that. In general, this was one of the reasons for abandoning Android. And yes, they didn’t have the programs I needed in life (and some still don’t).
System sluggishness. God, how slow Android is. And there are many reasons for this. For example, the “Back” button often does not close applications, as it should ideally do, but simply collapses them. Then, many manufacturers don’t like naked Android, they come up with their own shells and launchers, which also loads the processor, especially shells from Samsung, whose programmers are known for their crookedness; only coders from Microsoft can compete with them, who ruined Mail ;).
The caring attitude of manufacturers towards updating their devices. In my opinion, only smart phones from Google are regularly updated; for others, it’s easier to update the model range with the release of a new version of the system than to bother sending out updates to existing ones, even if they support new versions.
These are the main reasons why I don't want an Android device at the moment. And therefore I turn to the third point.
QUESTION THREE: WHY WINDOWS PHONE?
I have only one device on this system - my favorite 520. The most successful budget employee, IMHO. So why did I choose this particular system?
She doesn't slow down. Everything works very smoothly. I don’t see any lags (only in some fairly heavy games like Asphalt).
Native office support (which was not available in either iOS or Android at the time of Lumiya’s purchase). And this is very important for me at work.
The local store is small, but I found what I needed there (for example, a city transport schedule; there was no such application for my city in other systems).
Finally, convenient cartography and navigation! It’s a pity, of course, that it’s no longer exclusive, but still.
Visual style. I love live tiles. It’s a handy thing and looks better than static iOS or Android widgets.
Of course, not everything is perfect in this system and here is what I would really like to add to it:
The ability to set the ringtone yourself, without the crutches of connecting to a computer and without using third-party programs.
Synchronization with a computer “over the air” via WiFi.
To summarize, I want to say that I am not the most demanding user, all the above was my personal opinion and personal impressions, but despite all its shortcomings and very little popularity, Windows Phone and its successor Windows 10 Mobile are all I need . And I don’t need any iOS or Android for nothing.
These days, the variety of mobile devices sold in the market offers a wide choice for every user. Everyone can choose a gadget, focusing not only on technical preferences, but also on the operating system. The most controversy arises regarding which is better: ios android or windows phone. Let's analyze each of them and determine the leader.
For analysis, we will consider the following indicators: the prevalence and preferences of users, the number of applications available for installation, accessibility and ease of use, stability of operation.
User preferences and prevalence
By comparing windows phone vs android, we will answer the question: which is better. The most common, of course, is the Android OS. Developed by Google, this operating system has practically captured the mobile device market. It is preferred by 75% of users. Windows phone is chosen by the owners of 12% of gadgets.
These indicators depend not only on the choice of users. Android is installed by default on most of the gadgets sold, while Windows Mobile is used for certain models that can be listed fairly quickly.
When choosing a smartphone, the user on average considers 2 times more options on Android, but devices equipped with Windows will have a maximum of 10. At the same time, he needs to decide which is better android or windows phone. The latter is mainly installed on manufactured smartphones by Nokia, which is currently owned by Microsoft Corporation. Among the range of other manufacturers, Windows models are rather an exception among Androids.
Range of applications in the store
When choosing which is better, windows phone 8 or android, you should pay attention to the number of applications presented in the developer’s official store. The functionality of the purchased device depends on this.
The Windows Store offers users a choice of 125,000 applications, while users from Russia can use only 105 thousand. The closest competitor offers Russians 7 times more different applications on its PlayMarket platform. That is why those who like to try new games and other functionality should keep this feature in mind when deciding which platform is better than Android or Windows Phone. By choosing the second system, the smartphone owner will have to limit the ability to use most popular applications. The reason for such a meager choice is that the main efforts of developers are directed primarily to versions of programs for Google Play and AppStore, and filling the Windows Store is carried out on a residual basis.
If you need to choose and buy an excellent phone, then you can buy Lenovo A536 from our partner. They have a very large selection of different gadgets and devices for every taste.
Operation stability
The stability of a mobile phone OS is a rather vague and subjective concept that directly depends on the needs of the user. If the gadget is needed only for communication via voice and messages, both systems work without interruption. Difficulties can only arise when actively using the device. An unexpected error can await the owner of any OS, but more often “bugs” haunt Android.
But the problem of virus protection for Android is very significant. This system is highly vulnerable and susceptible to infection by spyware and virus applications. Infection can occur quite easily. But there is no need to worry, such “pests” cannot cause significant damage, and an antivirus program, a wide selection of which is offered by PlayMarket, will help protect you.
But the answer to the question of what is better than windows phone 8 or android in terms of virus protection is clear - Windows Background. This advantage of the OS is due to its closed source code, which is not susceptible to viruses in principle.
Availability
Which is better android or windows phone in terms of accessibility for users? For a similar amount, you can pick up one of the popular Android smartphones or a mid-level Windows phone. Top-end Windows models will cost significantly more.
Gadgets made in China with Android installed by default can be purchased several times cheaper. But it is worth remembering that the quality will be appropriate.
Ease of use
The last stage of the battle windows phone vs android shows that it is better to opt for Android smartphones. This opinion was formed based on the personal feelings of users.
The Windows system is much simpler; the desktop is made in the form of tiles, which at the same time serve as shortcuts for launching applications. The user will understand everything in a couple of minutes. Android will remind many of the PC version of Windows. There are icons on the desktop that are also shortcuts for launching applications. The time spent getting acquainted with the operation of the system will be somewhat longer in this case.
Many smartphone buyers are interested in installing various applications. Some need them for work, others for entertainment. Which is better in this regard among ios android or windows phone systems? Android is extremely flexible, so this system allows the user to perform almost any action.
Gadgets on Windows Phone are characterized by a closed source code. This repels some of the most active users, but at the same time makes such a smartphone popular for those who value device security.
Let's sum it up
When deciding which platform is better than Android or Windows phone, it turned out that Android wins. It will be the best solution for those who want to get maximum functionality. Many applications, convenience and openness of the system appeal to most users. The Microsoft system is ideal for those who prefer simplicity and security in their mobile device. Despite the small selection of applications in the store, the main functionality is still provided in full.
Articles and Lifehacks
Any manufacturer knows how to colorfully describe the advantages of their products. Let's try to answer the question honestly, which is better: android or windows phone, and also tell you about their weaknesses.
It is obvious that for several years nothing revolutionary has happened on the mobile technology market, either in the creation of new models of gadgets or in the development of the OS. The power of new smartphones has not become fantastic, but all because developers simply do not care about significant innovations. As a rule, we see improvements in the usual flagships. It would also not be worthwhile to state unequivocally that it was more recently introduced than windows phone. Shall we figure it out?
Why is Android better? 10 reasons not to buy Windows Phone
One of the main reasons against buying a WP device is the unreasonable ratio of parameters such as price and quality. It's no secret that not many companies produce these devices. In fact, today there is only one of them left on the market, and this is Nokia. Working with Windows Phone turned out to be an unprofitable business, and the modern buyer is forced to pay a lot of money for the fact that Microsoft has never been able to create a truly competitive platform. Unfortunately, today it requires constant material investments.
The second reason is that Nokia releases a supposedly new device every few months, and thereby deceives its potential buyer. Upon closer inspection, it becomes clear that the differences between the devices, which were released several months apart, are actually quite insignificant.
The third reason is Microsoft's approach to supporting its customers. The fourth is the difficulty of selling WP devices on the secondary market (if the need arises).
Since Windows Phone is a relatively young platform, finding the right program, or a program with a sufficient level of functionality, is very difficult (maybe more difficult than earlier models). This is reason number five. Sixth is the lack of many additional accessories that would be useful: smart watches, pedometers, etc.
The seventh reason is that Microsoft services are not popular today. For example, the Windows Phone platform offers Bing search. Obviously, most users prefer Google, and they have to manually change the search in the device settings. Also, WP owners will not be able to use Google Chrome, that is, the most popular browser in the world.
The Windows Phone platform does not provide the space for a unified experience across multiple devices (such as a smartphone and tablet) in the same way as iOS or Android, and this is the eighth reason. Reason number nine is inadequate quality of warranty service.
The tenth reason is that Microsoft itself does not have much faith in the prospects for the development of a platform such as Windows Phone. Who else, if not the manufacturer himself, can convince the buyer of the opposite?
Android or Windows Phone: which is better?
Note that the WP platform, the weaknesses of which we described above, is not popular among users primarily due to its closed source code. However, if we are trying to find out which is better: Android or Windows phone, we should know that low popularity does not mean that the operating system is worse in all respects. Of course, WP also has its advantages - for example, the interface is very convenient.
Fans of animated desktop wallpapers should be aware that they can only be installed on Android. Also, the advantage of this platform lies in the wide possibilities for customizing the interface.
The open source nature of the Android system allows it to be more flexible and easily adapt to consumer needs. If we prefer to customize everything at our own discretion, we should choose this platform. However, Android often exhibits instability during operation; It is also poorly protected from viruses. Windows Phone's closed source code makes this system less flexible, but it is more stable and reliable. Moreover, Android supports multitasking. This is not only an advantage, but also a disadvantage, because as a result the battery discharges much faster.
Android users can download any program at their discretion. The Windows Phone platform also offers the most important built-in applications. What's the difference? Android maps are much more convenient than, for example, Nokia Maps. Both platforms support NFC technology, but storing money is more convenient (and more reliable) on a Windows wallet. Of course, there are many more programs tailored for Android. The weakness is that not all of them are compatible with different versions of the operating system.
In conclusion, we note that Android combines both unsuccessful and ingenious solutions. In turn, on Windows Phone everything is very reliable and stable. This system works well, with virtually no lag, but is much less flexible than Android.
Which is better Android or iOS, or maybe you should choose a Windows tablet? You can argue about the advantages and disadvantages of these mobile phones for a very long time. Moreover, in each individual case we will talk exclusively about the subjective perception of the software, and not about its real positive and negative sides.
Therefore, in order to answer the question of whether to choose Android or iOS, or a Windows device, you need to look at these operating systems from the inside, that is, evaluate the functional and technical aspects of their work.
Availability
Mobile devices from Apple have always been and remain the most expensive. The average cost of an iPhone is about $500, and an iPad is even higher. Therefore, you won’t be able to save money on buying such a gadget.
A more affordable option are smartphones and tablets running Windows. Today, this mobile operating system is used on devices of various brands (Nokia, Samsung, LG, etc.), which provides quite a wide range of options for choosing a mobile gadget.
Android can be found on devices of a wide variety of price categories, from smartphones costing $50 to top-end tablets costing several hundred dollars. That is why Android is the most common mobile system, and iOS or Windows are quite significantly behind it.
Interface
When it comes to the appearance of the user interface, iOS and Android are very similar. Windows has some differences because it is based on a tiled interface. In general, with each new generation, all three mobile systems become more attractive and suitable for performing typical actions.
Some ardent supporters of Android devices talk about such a significant advantage as the ability to change shells. In fact, only a small percentage of smartphone and tablet users on this mobile OS use this feature.
Applications
If we evaluate the number of applications in the official Android and iOS stores, then there are approximately the same number of them, about one and a half million for each system. Windows lags very far behind in this regard, losing about a million applications.
The highest quality programs and games are released for mobile devices running iOS. It was on this platform that most games and applications appeared, which became hits and migrated to other mobile platforms. It should be noted that in terms of the number of free software, Android is the clear leader. However, most applications are only shareware, meaning you have to pay for their full functionality.
Autonomy
Short battery life without recharging is a major problem for both iOS Android or Windows users and their developers. Colorful 3D games, multifunctional applications, surfing the Internet - all this drains batteries very quickly, causing a lot of indignation among users.
It is believed that Apple mobile devices have the most balanced power system. In fact, it all depends on the mode of operation of the gadget, as well as the desire to use the device in energy-saving mode, which is available in most tablets and smartphones on any OS. If you don’t want to be separated from your mobile assistant for even an hour, be prepared to charge it every 15-20 hours, regardless of its brand and operating system installed.
Personalization
From this point of view, the clear winner is devices running on Android. A lot of different launchers, firmware versions, widgets and other software allow users of Android devices to radically change the OS interface, customizing it to solve certain necessary tasks.
As for iOS, there are also many widgets for it, but almost all users are tired of having to link to the notification center. Windows can only change the color scheme and resize the icons, so it can’t be decorated or enlivened.
Accessories
The clear winner in this category is iOS. If you love all sorts of newfangled things and are looking for an answer to the question of whether to choose iOS or Android, then the clear option for you is an Apple smartphone or tablet. A huge number of accessories are available for iPhone and iPad to suit every taste. As for devices on Windows Phone and Android, only top-end gadgets can boast at least a small number of useful accessories.
Frame
What is better than iOS or Android or Windows in terms of the “indestructibility” of the case is very difficult to answer. Although Apple devices are considered the most durable, Android and Windows gadgets in the same price category are also made from high-quality materials, including metal, and are equipped with shock-proof and scratch-resistant touchscreens. Everything depends solely on the accuracy of the user and the operating conditions of the mobile device.
Camera
The highest quality cameras are used on iOS. Although the number of pixels in the cameras of Apple devices is inferior to the flagships on Android or Windows Phone, due to the deep elaboration of small details, iOS shows a clear leadership.
Safety
Mobile gadgets running Windows are the least susceptible to hacker attacks. However, this is due to their low popularity. As for the OS security itself, leadership here must be given to Apple products. The company pays attention not only to protecting devices from web attacks, but also from unauthorized manual access. The most effective solution to this problem is the fingerprint scanner used on the iPhone 5S and some other devices.
Ease of use
All three operating systems are user-friendly and intuitive. Even switching between them will not cause significant problems, since you can understand the intricacies and settings of each OS in a couple of days.
conclusions
What is better: iOS or Android or Windows? There is no clear answer to this question. It all depends on several factors, including:
- price category of phones or tablets being compared;
- purpose of purchase;
- applications and functions used;
- age category of users;
- other conditions.
Thus, in order not to fall for the tricks of sellers, advertising or zealous fans of a particular mobile operating system, you need to decide on the budget for the purchase of the gadget and the purpose of its acquisition, and only then start comparing devices on different platforms.
